Well-being as a Strategic Framework for Healthcare Policy, Management, and Evaluation: A Conceptual Analysis with OECD Evidence

Abstract

This study examines the theoretical foundations of well-being and assesses its applicability as a strategic framework for healthcare policy management, planning, implementation, and evaluation. Methodology: A conceptual-descriptive research design was employed, combining a critical review of relevant scientific literature with a secondary analysis of OECD well-being indicators. The methodological approach included thematic content analysis, comparative analysis, and descriptive interpretation of empirical data related to subjective life satisfaction and health outcomes. Results: The findings indicate a positive association between subjective life satisfaction and objective health indicators. Countries characterized by strong healthcare systems, comprehensive social protection mechanisms, and integrated public policies consistently demonstrate higher levels of both subjective and objective well-being. The analysis confirms the multidimensional nature of well-being and its relevance for healthcare policy evaluation. Conclusions: Well-being represents a valuable framework for healthcare system management and governance. Integrating subjective and objective indicators into policy planning and evaluation can contribute to more effective, equitable, and sustainable healthcare policies. Recommendations: Healthcare policymakers should increasingly incorporate multidimensional well-being indicators into strategic planning, performance monitoring, and policy evaluation processes. Additional data: The proposed framework is supported by a review of contemporary well-being literature and a comparative analysis of selected OECD indicators.